Gun Control explained

Started by DigitalBuddha, October 31, 2012, 01:16:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DigitalBuddha


Stever

Yeah,I mark it an 8 too!
Have you seen Penn & Tellers gun control videos?
I got links,if ya wants...
Watching that,I saw links to cools stuff,and...2 human paraquat's jumped out at me!
Rosie O Donnell,and Micheal Moore! :-\

milnie

The issue of police carrying guns came up in the uk recently after 2 police women were shot dead on a "routine" call out. It's a vicious circle dudes and not an easy one to argue
quod tendo non ut pallens adeo in terminus!

Zen Dog

A cop recently shot a blind bloke in the back because he thought the white stick was a katana.Just as well it was only a tazer he was using.
If you believe you can tell me what to think.
I believe I can tell you where to go.

milnie

Yeah I read about that. There had been reports of a nutter with a sword and they mistook his white cane.
It's easy to criticise the police but everyone gets scared regardless of training  and you can just make the wrong decision
quod tendo non ut pallens adeo in terminus!

Stever

not any easy topic,dudes...Rosie O Donnel wants our guns,but the bitch has armed security..So does Michel Moore..
Brad Pitt came out pro-gun,and got raped in the media..
Dial 911..help is only a few minutes away...response time for me is 7-to 15 minutes,and I live a mile or so away from the cop shop...fuck you..Im keeping my guns! ;D

DigitalBuddha

#6
Quote from: Stever on November 01, 2012, 03:28:40 AM
not any easy topic,dudes...Rosie O Donnel wants our guns,but the bitch has armed security..So does Michel Moore..
Brad Pitt came out pro-gun,and got raped in the media..
Dial 911..help is only a few minutes away...response time for me is 7-to 15 minutes,and I live a mile or so away from the cop shop...fuck you..Im keeping my guns! ;D

My answer to the strumpets like Rosie O Donnel and undudes like Michel Moore.............

Amendment II, The Constitution of the United States of America

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. ... shall not be infringed!


The Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme law of the land; any attempt to violate it is a high crime, potentially treason and punishable. IMHO, it is high time anyone caught in an attempt and/or conspiracy to thwart any clause or any amendment which as been lawfully included in The Constitution should be indited, convicted and properly punished. Take heed Rosie O Donnel, Michel Moore, Barbara Boxer, Diane Finstien, Gun Control, Inc. and others who would tread on my rights; I agree, fuck you.

But you know, it's funny...........



As always, IMHDO 8)

Stever

Well said!!
And the experts on gun control have not been very dude-like..I want that for a poster!
Or better yet,a fucking billboard!

milnie

As a limey I don't get that the constitution  hasn't been modernised. I can understand the right to have a gun when it was originally drawn up but now it seems outdated. Is owning a gun really that important for everyday life in America?
I'm not trying to piss on your rug here guys, hell I'm a good shot and was a member of a rifle club at uni and did enjoy it greatly but feel no need to have a gun.
quod tendo non ut pallens adeo in terminus!

Masked Dude

The Constitution was written to make it difficult to update or modernize. In law school we learned that was done on purpose. That's when you get into discussions, debates, and arguments about the interpretation of it.
* Carpe diem all over the damn place *
Abide like the Dude when you can
Yell like Walter when you must
Be like Donny when you are

Ordained 2012-Aug-25
Honorary PhD Pop Cultural Studies, Abidance Counseling, Skeptology
Highly Unofficial Discord: https://discord.gg/XMpfCSr

Zen Dog

#10
Muskets dude, muskets.What if you miss? Dude,if you can't shoot straight,should you be shooting at all? Hell, why not just nuke the fucking neighbourhood? It seems to me that if you can emancipate the chattels then adjusting the regulations on firelocks.............and one other thing dudes,doesn't this rule apply to a well regulated militia? And isn't the militia the National Guard? Honest questions dudes, so take 'er easy.
If you believe you can tell me what to think.
I believe I can tell you where to go.

DigitalBuddha

Quote from: milnie on November 01, 2012, 05:36:49 PM
I can understand the right to have a gun when it was originally drawn up but now it seems outdated. Is owning a gun really that important for everyday life in America?

Outdated? When were these people all in power (see below)? Answer; The last few years. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution is just as important today as the day it was penned. I say again...........




DigitalBuddha

#12
Quote from: Zen Dog on November 01, 2012, 06:04:12 PM
Muskets dude, muskets.What if you miss? Dude,if you can't shoot straight,should you be shooting at all? Hell, why not just nuke the fucking neighbourhood? It seems to me that if you can emancipate the chattels then adjusting the regulations on firelocks.............and one other thing dudes,doesn't this rule apply to a well regulated militia? And isn't the militia the National Guard? Honest questions dudes, so take 'er easy.

It's that all important comma that bugs the shit out of gun control fanatics. Notice...

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state COMMA the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

The comma indicates two SEPARATE thoughts;

   1. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state. This is stating the purpose of owning weapons (besides self defense), without a "well regulated militia" a free state is in serious jeopardy from outside or inside attack.

   2. In order to have a "well regulated militia" THE PEOPLE must "keep and bear arms." In other words, the arms are in the hands of the people, not some central government location, so that NO government, foreign or domestic, can take the freedom and liberty from the people because they, the government, control the arms. In other words; in order to have a viable effective well regulated militia of the people (notice it does NOT say a "government regulated militia), THE PEOPLE are to control the weapons personally. That is only common sense.

   3. It was well understood at the time of the creation of the US Constitution that the people would be free to own, possess and bear arms.

Rosie O Donnel can mark it zero and go fuck herself.




...IMHDO 8)

DigitalBuddha

Quote from: Masked Dude on November 01, 2012, 05:50:23 PM
The Constitution was written to make it difficult to update or modernize. In law school we learned that was done on purpose. That's when you get into discussions, debates, and arguments about the interpretation of it.

That is very true; it's hard to change it so that it will be stable from generation to generation.

milnie

Quote from: DigitalBuddha on November 01, 2012, 08:10:15 PM
Quote from: milnie on November 01, 2012, 05:36:49 PM
I can understand the right to have a gun when it was originally drawn up but now it seems outdated. Is owning a gun really that important for everyday life in America?

Outdated? When were these people all in power (see below)? Answer; The last few years. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution is just as important today as the day it was penned. I say again...........





Yes, but none of them lived in the USA. domestic gun control has got fuck all to do with dictators in other contries. your constitution was written at a time when the right to bear arms was a critical part of daily life due to the lawlessness and harsh living conditions in a large part of the USA. why the fuck do you (plural dude, not just DB) need a gun now, sitting in your cosy condo, drinking white russians, food delivered to your door? is it for snakes and what not? by a mongoose!
quod tendo non ut pallens adeo in terminus!