Tip: Click on the white arrow to the right to collapse and expand this header.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It is based on math and logic. Neither of those are empirical. The whole issue of dark matter and the expansion of the universe are only answerable by mathematical speculation, and not the good kind. Physicists don't really like the "oh well, there must be all this dark matter we can't detect" answer. And like religion, it fills an observed gap. It may be vastly more logical, but it is still in function mathematical speculation. At quantum levels, math starts to break down and you are back to an obtuse form of empirical speculation.In fact this conversation has shown me one thing - you are not interested in synthesis, you are interested in expounding why you hate religion and not in an actual discussion. Looking through your posts proves that, and that is empirically proven. I can get enough of that in high school, and so I am, as they say, out.Good day, sir.
the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
Get Dudeism tee shirts, ordination certificates and more. Help feed our monkey. Click Here