The Dudeism Forum

Does the female form make you nervous?

Kate topless pictures: Royals seek to ban Closer images

I guess "royal boobs" in the press are a no no! LMAO! (peasant boobs are permitted)

Lawyers for the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have begun a bid in a French court to stop the sale and distribution of topless pictures of the duchess.

Their lawyer called for French magazine Closer to hand over the digital originals or face a daily fine, during a civil hearing in Nanterre near Paris.



Support boob freedom! - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19620164

Nah mate. I don't see how pictures of her taken in a private residence by some fucker a mile away is anything but invasion of privacy. Or how it is in the public interest. Well over the line ...
If the photographer wanted to take pictures of a pair of boobs, he/she should go to the republican convention

Quote from: milnie on September 17, 2012, 05:32:52 PM
Nah mate. I don't see how pictures of her taken in a private residence by some fucker a mile away is anything but invasion of privacy. Or how it is in the public interest. Well over the line ...
If the photographer wanted to take pictures of a pair of boobs, he/she should go to the republican convention

Yes, you will see a lot of boobs at the Republican convention, this is true!

OK I have seen the uncecerd photos and frankly they are kind of boring she looks more flat chested then having boobs really so who really cares I am not trying to say boo flat chested woman they don't have boobs don't pay attention to them no what I am saying is if the pictures whear better looking and sharper I can understand other wise a boob is a boob who cares I still won't object to seeing them but the only reason this is news is the boobs are royal boobs

OMG!!!!! Woman (well lucky woman by birth) who happens to be married to (extremely lucky guy by birth )

I refuse to say privileged! 

Actually has tits.... she's married to a cunt so hopefully that will make her complete!

I could not give a monkeys arse hole about the "Royal" family and actually would quite enjoy seeing them all die in tunnels...hopefully this time in full colour CCTV and preferably in HD!

Peace?

Your being vary un-dude man. Did the dude wish or hope for the death of the nialists after they broke I. Reached his apartment  threatening to cut off his Johnson? No he only hoped the big lebowski would kill him before that could happen. Just take it easy man

QuoteYour being vary un-dude man.

Yeah I was.

Quick rant and now I'm over it! 

Peace to yah Revpurdy.

The dichotomy of all dudes; his or her inner Dude, and inner Walter coming out; we all have to deal with it..............

Nice one DB!

(see what I did there....no need for a like button!)     

Peace man.

Quote from: Caesar dude on September 19, 2012, 05:18:13 PM
Nice one DB!

(see what I did there....no need for a like button!)     

Peace man.

Like

Fuck off!

Be erudite you lazy slob!



Peace dude!

Quote from: Caesar dude on September 19, 2012, 05:39:07 PM
Fuck off!

Be erudite you lazy slob!



Peace dude!

Dude, you have paid a fellow dude an awesome compliment; I'm trying to be the laziest dude in Los Angeles.

Quote from: Caesar dude on September 17, 2012, 08:28:01 PM
I could not give a monkeys arse hole about the "Royal" family and actually would quite enjoy seeing them all die in tunnels...hopefully this time in full colour CCTV and preferably in HD!

I too could not be bothered with the royal family, to quote an old English teacher of mine, just because one of their ancestors stabbed the right person in the back why should they have all the money?

I don't wish them dead, just economically curtailed.

And lets be honest, their lawyers are taking action now, hands up who hasn't seen the pictures on the internet, get with the program royalty too little too late.

I love you Meekon!

In a dude way clearly!

Peace mate.

I've read the same thing from other dudes from the UK; it would seem there is a growing sentiment to get rid of the "royal family" and just who the fuck says they are "royal?" I'm not from the UK (although my father is and my mother was born Canada [part of the British Empire]) so I would say that my opinion on the matter is obviously limited, but I am wondering when England is going to get rid of their royal asses.

You are already an advanced parliamentary system and democracy, who the fuck needs a "royal family" who does little or nothing but sit on their royal asses and be waited on hand and foot. They don't even participate much in government beyond what anyone could be involved in. Isn't time they bowed out of the royal bullshit and get a job? England has moved well beyond the need for a royal anything! It's the 21st fucking century; who the fuck needs a useless relic from 500 years ago? Kings, Queens, Dukes, Princes, Princesses, etc.

If I was born in Britain, I can tell you I would want their royal butts out and off public welfare. They seem to serve little purpose beyond material for gossip mags and the occasional boob photo and a scandal here and there. Who was at the helm during the Falkland island war? Sure as shit wasn't the Queen Mother; it was the Prime Minister, Maggie Thacher, an ELECTED official.

Just IMHO. Am I wrong, or just an asshole?