uggabugga uggabugga
* * *
Return to Dudeism.com |  recentposts2

Author Topic: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?  (Read 36796 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Turtle

  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 458
  • ...you know me...I can't complain...
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #15 on: July 13, 2008, 08:15:43 AM »


Digital Buddha, my dude, your line is as straight as a johnson that has been jerked off manually way too many times, I'm sorry, brother, but this is not a level field of play.

You have to take into account depth of perception within a, within a 3 dimensional environment, your line would work if this was a 2-dimensional reality, however, in 3 dimensions, we must account for the curve of the space-time continuum which Einstein has explained so eloquently in previous literature.

Even though your line is straight, it is actually curved because it is in 2 dimensions where Smokey is in 3, however, in 3 dimensions (my line) curves, but comes out straight with an accurate estimate of measurement taking into account the equation of E=mc2+the Dude abides.

Given these new leads and this new shit which has come to light, I must declare that still no definitive evidence has been brought forth to prove one way or the other whether Smokey was actually over the line and whether we should mark it an 8 or a 0.

The only thing that has been shown here, beyond a shadow of a doubt, is that, digitalbuddha and myself, have WAY to much time on our hands.   ;D
« Last Edit: July 13, 2008, 06:16:08 PM by Turtle »
Careful man, there's a beverage here!



No funny stuff, ok?

DigitalBuddha

  • Administrator
  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 9523
  • I ain't never seen no queen in her damn undies...
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #16 on: July 13, 2008, 01:56:47 PM »


Digital Buddha, my dude, your line is as straight as a johnson that has been jerked off manually way too many times, I'm sorry, brother, but this is not a level field of play.

You have to take into account depth of perception within a, within a 3 dimensional environment, your line would work if this was a 2-dimensional reality, however, in 3 dimensions, we must account for the curve of the space-time continuum which Einstein has explained so eloquently in previous literature.

Even thought your line is straight, it is actually curved because it is in 2 dimensions where Smokey is in 3, however, in 3 dimensions (my line) curves, but comes out straight with an accurate estimate of measurement taking into account the equation of E=mc2+the Dude abides.

Given these new leads and this new shit which has come to light, I must declare that still no definitive evidence has been brought forth to prove one way or the other whether Smokey was actually over the line and whether we should mark it an 8 or a 0.

The only thing that has been shown here, beyond a shadow of a doubt, is that, digitalbuddha and myself, have WAY to much time on our hands.   ;D

 ;D Turtle dude, what the fuck are you blathering about?

Methodology.........


The bowling lane begins (officially) at the point at the end of the gutter. That is where the foul line is (and presumably the foul line sensor). If a dude's toe slips over the line, it's MARK IT ZERO. See exhibit one below for location of the foul line at the point of the end of the gutter.......

Exhibit one........



My line was carefully traced and drawn from the exact end of the gutter on the right to the exact end of the gutter on the left. Close examination clearly shows Smokey's toe to be just barely over the line as indicated. See..............

Exhibit two...........





You have to take into account depth of perception within a, within a 3 dimensional environment, your line would work if this was a 2-dimensional reality, however, in 3 dimensions, we must account for the curve of the space-time continuum which Einstein has explained so eloquently in previous literature.


T-dude, this is not Nam, there are rules.......You might fool the fucks in the league office, but you don't fool Digital Buddha! It's bush league psych-out stuff! Laughable, man!

OVER THE LINE! Mark it zero for Smokey.

« Last Edit: July 13, 2008, 02:15:47 PM by digitalbuddha »

Turtle

  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 458
  • ...you know me...I can't complain...
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #17 on: July 13, 2008, 06:48:42 PM »
I know my rights man. I want a fucking lawyer.

Dbuddha, you're still not taking into account the 3 dimensional reality.
Exhibit 4 clearly shows how straight lines become warped when viewing
3 dimensions on a 2 dimensional platform such as when you watch a movie.

Exhibit 5 shows the line without me emphasizing it by tracing it in black as I did before.
You can clearly see that the actual foul line does not match up to the position of your line.

Exhibit 4:



Exhibit 5:



Anyway, my thinking about this case has become very uptight,
working in shifts and all that, I don't think any new shit is going to
come to light here, no promising leads in this direction, and, actually
I don't see how any of this has anything to do with my rug.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2008, 06:59:13 PM by Turtle »
Careful man, there's a beverage here!



No funny stuff, ok?

DigitalBuddha

  • Administrator
  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 9523
  • I ain't never seen no queen in her damn undies...
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #18 on: July 13, 2008, 07:39:34 PM »
Turtle-dude, its like Digital Buddha said, you look at the toe and it "appears to be barely over the line." Because of the quality of the image, it is impossible to tell for sure. You gotta buck up man, and dig what I'm saying. We will never know for sure, but either way you look at it, the line you drew...across this line you do not!!...oh, sorry, lost my train ah' thought here...as I was saying; the line you drew traced an incorrect path between the two boarders of the gutters (i.e., the foul line) falsely placing Smokey's toe behind the foul line. Obviously, you're not a golfer...


You wanna a toe, I can get you a toe, dude  ;D

Turtle

  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 458
  • ...you know me...I can't complain...
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #19 on: July 13, 2008, 07:46:53 PM »
Exhibit 6




Woo peed on my rug.
Careful man, there's a beverage here!



No funny stuff, ok?

DigitalBuddha

  • Administrator
  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 9523
  • I ain't never seen no queen in her damn undies...
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #20 on: July 13, 2008, 07:58:16 PM »
Exhibit 6




Woo peed on my rug.

That rug really tied the room together, did it not?

 ;D T-dude, you are a worthy fucking adversary...the Turtle in the black pajamas. Now that's combat...
« Last Edit: July 13, 2008, 11:11:55 PM by digitalbuddha »

Turtle

  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 458
  • ...you know me...I can't complain...
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #21 on: July 14, 2008, 02:49:52 AM »
Quote
;D T-dude, you are a worthy fucking adversary...the Turtle in the black pajamas. Now that's combat...

I dig yer style too man, got the whole digitalbuddha thing goin.   :)
Careful man, there's a beverage here!



No funny stuff, ok?

SmokeytheBuddha

  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • You happy, you crazy fuck?
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #22 on: July 14, 2008, 11:18:51 AM »
But that picture shows Smokey AFTER he threw the ball. Perhaps Walter bellowing at poor Smokey so startled him that it caused him to cross the line (assuming that's what the photo proves).

You know how fragile Smokey is, man. He has emotional problems.

To definitively confirm or disconfirm that Smokey was over the line, we'd have to have a shot of him actually bowling, which we don't have.

Mark it an unsolvable mystery, dude.
The whole concept abates.

Andrea D.

  • Dude
  • ******
  • Posts: 766
  • Business papers
    • Dudeismo nihilista
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #23 on: July 14, 2008, 04:33:33 PM »
Digitalbuddha, Turtle, SmokeytheBuddha : They really cares about the rules.
Dime Sandra.ĦĦQue ridiculo!!

Turtle

  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 458
  • ...you know me...I can't complain...
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #24 on: July 14, 2008, 08:13:39 PM »
Hahahaha. Fuck it.
Careful man, there's a beverage here!



No funny stuff, ok?

SmokeytheBuddha

  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • You happy, you crazy fuck?
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #25 on: July 14, 2008, 08:43:10 PM »
Digitalbuddha, Turtle, SmokeytheBuddha : They really cares about the rules.

Rules?

Is this a...what discussion board is this?
The whole concept abates.

brandt

  • Dude
  • ******
  • Posts: 821
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #26 on: July 14, 2008, 11:59:52 PM »
what in god's name are you blathering about, it's clear that smokey could not accomplish the simple task of dropping a ball onto the floor without going "over the line", therefore the goddamn plane has crashed into the mountain, which is the literal connection to not following the goddamn rules.


obviously your not a golfer. :o

DigitalBuddha

  • Administrator
  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 9523
  • I ain't never seen no queen in her damn undies...
Re: Was Smokey Really Over The Line?
« Reply #27 on: July 15, 2008, 12:09:25 AM »
This is not Nam............

 

Recent Posts

Store

Dude Vinci
Get Dudeism tee shirts, ordination certificates and more. Help feed our monkey.
Click Here

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 13, 2022, 08:02:28 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recently Posted

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 54561
  • Total Topics: 6471
  • Online Today: 66
  • Online Ever: 8112
  • (October 04, 2021, 09:08:24 PM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 44
Total: 44