The Dudeism Forum

  http://forfeiturereform.com/2010/12/03/will-the-dea-shut-down-every-major-music-festival-in-the-country/

Quote from: cakebelly on December 09, 2010, 03:01:49 PM
http://forfeiturereform.com/2010/12/03/will-the-dea-shut-down-every-major-music-festival-in-the-country/

OVER THE FUCKING LINE!!! What, are they the fucking music festival park rangers now?! Fucking nazis!! What a bunch of assholes.

Under that "logic" and given the amount of serious crimes committed by the White House and the US Congress at the Capital, "we the people" should "claim for seizure and forfeiture of BOTH properties on the grounds that for years politicians have engaged in high crimes and misdemeanors on them."

We know our rights, man!! THOSE are the fucking rules!

Fucking nazis, nothing ever changes. Mark it zero for the DEA.

The Supreme Court has roundly
   rejected prior restraint!

Quote from: BikerDude on December 15, 2010, 01:37:34 PM
The Supreme Court has roundly
   rejected prior restraint!

Fucking eh, and I'm staying, finishing my coffee...enjoying my coffee.

nothing ever changes.
fuckin amateurs

Nixon, ah - how when I think of the past it brings up so many memories. How has Mojo been these days?

Bob Ainsworth: 'War on drugs is not working'

Watch the Reactionary try to bad talk the sensible bloke.

Your Homework should you choose to do it:

http://www.cedro-uva.org/lib/reinarman.devil.html

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/55614/joris-vos-joseph-a-califano-jr-et-al/dazed-and-confused-smoke-and-mirrors-over-dutch-drug-policy

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11001803

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/08/drugs-legalise-mexico-california

Quote from: digitalbuddha on December 15, 2010, 06:58:25 PM

Quote from: BikerDude on December 15, 2010, 01:37:34 PM
The Supreme Court has roundly
   rejected prior restraint!

Fucking eh, and I'm staying, finishing my coffee...enjoying my coffee.

I got buddies who died face-
down in the muck so you and I could
enjoy this music festival!

HAS THE WHOLE WORLD GONE CRAZY?  AM
I THE ONLY ONE HERE WHO GIVES A SHIT
ABOUT THE RULES?  MARK IT ZERO!

Quote from: meekon5 on December 16, 2010, 08:43:07 AM
Bob Ainsworth: 'War on drugs is not working'

Watch the Reactionary try to bad talk the sensible bloke.

Your Homework should you choose to do it:

http://www.cedro-uva.org/lib/reinarman.devil.html

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/55614/joris-vos-joseph-a-califano-jr-et-al/dazed-and-confused-smoke-and-mirrors-over-dutch-drug-policy

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11001803

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/08/drugs-legalise-mexico-california

We forgot to ask who wins if they win the "war on drugs win?"

And, we forgot to ask why the United States is running drugs? Check out.......

http://rationalrevolution.net/war/cia_drug_connection_under_reagan.htm

In 1998 the CIA finally admitted to its involvement in drug trafficking in the United States after years of federal investigation by the Kerry Congressional Committee.

What the CIA admitted to was allowing cocaine trafficking to take place by Contras who were being supported by the CIA, using facilities and resources supplied by the US government, and preventing investigation into these activities by other agencies.

This was done because funds for the support of militant groups in South America had been withdrawn by Congress so the CIA allowed the Contras to engage in the drug trade in the United States in order to make money to fund their military operations.

If you are wondering why this was not covered more widely in the news during the Clinton Administration it may be because Arkansas was one of the major trafficking centers for the operations.

Lotta in's and out's.

Quote from: digitalbuddha on December 16, 2010, 07:37:55 PM

Quote from: meekon5 on December 16, 2010, 08:43:07 AM
Bob Ainsworth: 'War on drugs is not working'

Watch the Reactionary try to bad talk the sensible bloke.

Your Homework should you choose to do it:

http://www.cedro-uva.org/lib/reinarman.devil.html

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/55614/joris-vos-joseph-a-califano-jr-et-al/dazed-and-confused-smoke-and-mirrors-over-dutch-drug-policy

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11001803

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/08/drugs-legalise-mexico-california

We forgot to ask who wins if they win the "war on drugs win?"

And, we forgot to ask why the United States is running drugs? Check out.......

http://rationalrevolution.net/war/cia_drug_connection_under_reagan.htm

In 1998 the CIA finally admitted to its involvement in drug trafficking in the United States after years of federal investigation by the Kerry Congressional Committee.

What the CIA admitted to was allowing cocaine trafficking to take place by Contras who were being supported by the CIA, using facilities and resources supplied by the US government, and preventing investigation into these activities by other agencies.

This was done because funds for the support of militant groups in South America had been withdrawn by Congress so the CIA allowed the Contras to engage in the drug trade in the United States in order to make money to fund their military operations.

If you are wondering why this was not covered more widely in the news during the Clinton Administration it may be because Arkansas was one of the major trafficking centers for the operations.

The war on drugs man would mean half the politicians would go to jail and we know that is not happening any time soon. Over the line!