uggabugga uggabugga
* * *
Return to Dudeism.com |  recentposts2

Author Topic: dudeism symbol  (Read 35217 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Andrea D.

  • Dude
  • ******
  • Posts: 766
  • Business papers
    • Dudeismo nihilista
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #15 on: September 12, 2008, 11:36:23 AM »
I'm very very agree with forumdude, i think you have to put the radial lines in the symbol, it gives a very religious character, Dudeism, the light of the life.

The concept is very similar to this:
Dime Sandra.ˇˇQue ridiculo!!

always abides

  • Dude
  • ****
  • Posts: 128
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #16 on: September 12, 2008, 04:26:46 PM »

For a tattoo you'd probably be better off leaving the lines out.

I'm very very agree with forumdude, i think you have to put the radial lines in the symbol

What in God's holy name are you blathering about?

always abides

  • Dude
  • ****
  • Posts: 128
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #17 on: September 12, 2008, 06:48:23 PM »
and here is my version with radial lines, there are 23 lines though...not 21, i am no park ranger and couldn't figure out how to exactly space them and such, but fuck it

DigitalBuddha

  • Administrator
  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 9523
  • I ain't never seen no queen in her damn undies...
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #18 on: September 12, 2008, 10:41:03 PM »
The fucking symbol has fucking papers, can't board it, its hair fall out.

brandt

  • Dude
  • ******
  • Posts: 821
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #19 on: September 12, 2008, 11:01:18 PM »
Wouldn't you take the circumference and divide by whatever number of lines and the answer would be the distance of distribution between lines?

I'm no math ranger but that's just like my opinion, man!

DigitalBuddha

  • Administrator
  • Dude
  • *****
  • Posts: 9523
  • I ain't never seen no queen in her damn undies...
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #20 on: September 13, 2008, 01:14:09 AM »
I'm very very agree with forumdude, i think you have to put the radial lines in the symbol, it gives a very religious character, Dudeism, the light of the life.

The concept is very similar to this:



Is this the dude?  ;D

always abides

  • Dude
  • ****
  • Posts: 128
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #21 on: September 14, 2008, 06:53:39 PM »
Wouldn't you take the circumference and divide by whatever number of lines and the answer would be the distance of distribution between lines?

I'm no math ranger but that's just like my opinion, man!

that had not occurred to us, dude.  concerning the circumference...we just don't know, dude.

Dude1967

  • Dude
  • ******
  • Posts: 800
    • Church of the Latter Day Dude: New England Dudeocese
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #22 on: September 15, 2008, 01:15:14 PM »
if you do it by using radial lines the angle between each one would be 16.36degrees, if that helps any :D
Any man who doesn't know how to cook deserves every bad meal he ever gets.   -Richard "Dick" Leary   (1930-1997)

brandt

  • Dude
  • ******
  • Posts: 821
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #23 on: September 15, 2008, 01:40:05 PM »
It appears to me that is your concern

ozzy85

  • Dude
  • ****
  • Posts: 160
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #24 on: September 17, 2008, 01:58:00 AM »
Nice one, Dude!  That is worthy of some ink...
At least I'm housebroken.

always abides

  • Dude
  • ****
  • Posts: 128
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #25 on: September 17, 2008, 11:53:07 PM »
as a lazy man, and i most certainly am, i am going to not bother with getting the radial lines exactly right.  fuck it

brandt

  • Dude
  • ******
  • Posts: 821
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #26 on: September 18, 2008, 10:16:08 AM »
Oh yes, fuck it, that's your answer for everything

Take my advice, do what your parents did

Get radial lines sir, and get them exactly right

My radial lines were taken from me in Los Angle-iss
as a lazy man, and i most certainly am, i am going to not bother with getting the radial lines exactly right.  fuck it

always abides

  • Dude
  • ****
  • Posts: 128
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #27 on: September 19, 2008, 09:58:09 AM »
dude, los angle-iss is not the preferred nomenclature...angeles, please

Dude1967

  • Dude
  • ******
  • Posts: 800
    • Church of the Latter Day Dude: New England Dudeocese
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #28 on: September 19, 2008, 11:22:35 PM »
dude, los angle-iss is not the preferred nomenclature...angeles, please
  They call Los Angeles the City of
                         Angels.  I didn't find it to be that
                         exactly, but I'll allow as there are
                         some nice folks there.  'Course, I
                         can't say I seen London, and I never
                         been to France, and I ain't never
                         seen no queen in her damn undies as
                         the fella says.  But I'll tell you
                         what, after seeing Los Angeles and
                         thisahere story I'm about to unfold--
                         wal, I guess I seen somethin' ever'
                         bit as stupefyin' as ya'd see in any
                         a those other places, and in English
                         too, so I can die with a smile on my
                         face without feelin' like the good
                         Lord gypped me.
Any man who doesn't know how to cook deserves every bad meal he ever gets.   -Richard "Dick" Leary   (1930-1997)

brandt

  • Dude
  • ******
  • Posts: 821
Re: dudeism symbol
« Reply #29 on: September 22, 2008, 11:49:38 PM »
Fuckin' interesting, man
Very fucking interesting!

I can find this guy

 

Recent Posts

Store

Dude Vinci
Get Dudeism tee shirts, ordination certificates and more. Help feed our monkey.
Click Here

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 30, 2022, 12:31:58 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recently Posted

Members
  • Total Members: 3852
  • Latest: Jadde09
Stats
  • Total Posts: 54639
  • Total Topics: 6476
  • Online Today: 97
  • Online Ever: 8112
  • (October 04, 2021, 09:08:24 PM)
Users Online
Users: 1
Guests: 65
Total: 66