The Dudeism Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: BikerDude on January 05, 2015, 09:14:20 AM

Title: Pederass?
Post by: BikerDude on January 05, 2015, 09:14:20 AM
Quote
LONDON ? Buckingham Palace issued an unprecedented third denial Monday amid a spiraling scandal over a woman's claims that she was forced into underage sex with Prince Andrew and a U.S. billionaire.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/underage-sex-claims-against-prince-andrew-are-false-palace-n279666 (http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/underage-sex-claims-against-prince-andrew-are-false-palace-n279666)
Title: Re: Pederass?
Post by: DigitalBuddha on January 05, 2015, 10:39:57 PM
Eight year olds, dude.
Title: Re: Pederass?
Post by: Hominid on January 06, 2015, 02:50:32 AM
Innocent till proven guilty.  Theoretically.
Title: Re: Pederass?
Post by: meekon5 on January 06, 2015, 07:46:13 AM
And this is a civil suite (not a police action) where they have yet to file any actual proof.

Don't get me wrong now I am the least Loyalist person you could meet (useless bunch of inbreeds) I just think everyone is subject to due process and just because they are famouse does not mean they should be tried by media before the facts are fully available.

If he did it then he should pay the price. Until we have some evidence lets not jump on the band wagon.

Also we are seeing a lot of people making claims all of a sudden.

And just because I can't help myself its "Pederast" not "Pederass" (sorry).
Title: Re: Pederass?
Post by: markbueno on January 07, 2015, 07:01:00 PM
Quote from: meekon5 on January 06, 2015, 07:46:13 AM

If he did it then he should pay the price. Until we have some evidence lets not jump on the band wagon.


Very dudely thought there, Dude.  I agree, the media loves to proclaim guilt or innocence whichever way will get the most issues sold (not that this is a new development) and think they should have to keep mum in such cases or at least only get to report the known facts.