The Path Between Pseudo-Spirituality and Pseudo-Science

Started by BikerDude, April 17, 2014, 07:26:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BikerDude

http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-path-between-pseudo-spirituality-and-pseudo-science
Interesting read...

Quote
Authors who attempt to build a bridge between science and spirituality tend to make one of two mistakes: Scientists generally start with an impoverished view of spiritual experience, assuming that it must be a grandiose way of describing ordinary states of mind?parental love, artistic inspiration, awe at the beauty of the night sky. In this vein, one finds Einstein?s amazement at the intelligibility of Nature?s laws described as though it were a kind of mystical insight.

New Age thinkers usually enter the ditch on the other side of the road: They idealize altered states of consciousness and draw specious connections between subjective experience and the spookier theories at the frontiers of physics. Here we are told that the Buddha and other contemplatives anticipated modern cosmology or quantum mechanics and that by transcending the sense of self, a person can realize his identity with the One Mind that gave birth to the cosmos. In the end, we are left to choose between pseudo-spirituality and pseudo-science. -


Out here we are all his children


DigitalBuddha

Quote from: BikerDude on April 17, 2014, 07:26:33 PM
http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-path-between-pseudo-spirituality-and-pseudo-science
Interesting read...

Quote
Authors who attempt to build a bridge between science and spirituality tend to make one of two mistakes: Scientists generally start with an impoverished view of spiritual experience, assuming that it must be a grandiose way of describing ordinary states of mind?parental love, artistic inspiration, awe at the beauty of the night sky. In this vein, one finds Einstein?s amazement at the intelligibility of Nature?s laws described as though it were a kind of mystical insight.

New Age thinkers usually enter the ditch on the other side of the road: They idealize altered states of consciousness and draw specious connections between subjective experience and the spookier theories at the frontiers of physics. Here we are told that the Buddha and other contemplatives anticipated modern cosmology or quantum mechanics and that by transcending the sense of self, a person can realize his identity with the One Mind that gave birth to the cosmos. In the end, we are left to choose between pseudo-spirituality and pseudo-science. -

Interesting article, BD.  8)