Feinstein Goes For Broke With New Gun-Ban Bill

[Stever]

Please read!

http://www.nraila.org/legislation/federal-legislation/2012/feinstein-goes-for-broke-with-new-gun-ban-bill.aspx

[DigitalBuddha]

Please read!

http://www.nraila.org/legislation/federal-legislation/2012/feinstein-goes-for-broke-with-new-gun-ban-bill.aspx

That women is fucking insane!

By the way, check out...

Australia's Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research acknowledges that the gun ban had no significant impact on the amount of gun-involved crime:

In 2006, assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
Sexual assault -- Australia's equivalent term for rape -- increased 29.9 percent.
Overall, Australia's violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.
Moreover, Australia and the United States -- where no gun-ban exists -- both experienced similar decreases in murder rates:

Between 1995 and 2007, Australia saw a 31.9 percent decrease; without a gun ban, America's rate dropped 31.7 percent.
During the same time period, all other violent crime indices increased in Australia: assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
Sexual assault -- Australia's equivalent term for rape -- increased 29.9 percent.
Overall, Australia's violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.
At the same time, U.S. violent crime decreased 31.8 percent: rape dropped 19.2 percent; robbery decreased 33.2 percent; aggravated assault dropped 32.2 percent.
Australian women are now raped over three times as often as American women.

Possession of guns for personal protection decreases violent crime.

And check out........

The Failed Experiment
Gun Control and Public Safety in Canada,
Australia, England and Wales

Widely televised firearm murders in many countries during the 20th Century have spurred politicians to introduce restrictive gun laws. The politicians then promise that the new restrictions will reduce criminal violence and ?create a safer society.? It is time to pause and ask if gun laws actually do reduce criminal violence.

Gun laws must be demonstrated to cut violent crime or gun control is no more than a hollow promise. What makes gun control so compelling for many is the belief that violent crime is driven by the availability of guns and, more importantly, that criminal violence in general may be reduced by limiting access to firearms.

In this study, I examine crime trends in Commonwealth countries that have recently introduced firearm regulations: i.e., Great Britain, Australia, and Canada. The widely ignored key to evaluating firearm regulations is to examine trends in total violent crime, not just firearms crime. Since firearms are only a small fraction of criminal violence, the public would not be safer if the new law could reduce firearm violence but had no effect on total criminal violence.


This brief review of gun laws shows that disarming the public has not reduced criminal violence in any country examined here: not in Great Britain, not in Canada, and not in Australia. In all cases, disarming the public has been ineffective, expensive, and often counter productive. In all cases, the means have involved setting up expensive bureaucracies that produce no noticeable improvement to public safety or have made the situation worse. The results of this study are consistent with other academic research, that most gun laws do not have any measurable effect on crime (Kleck 1997: 377; Jacobs 2002). As I have argued elsewhere (Mauser 2001a),

The full report... (A FRASER INSTITUTE OCCASIONAL PAPER) http://www.gunsandcrime.org/faildxprmt.pdf

[Stever]

Dude,when has this crazy bitch EVER listened to FACTS,or LOGIC?
And also,lets not forget that Feinstein herself has a concealed carry permit!
Guns are good for her,and her staff,but bad for everyone else.
Not much I can say about a hypocrite like this,except I think she IS insane,and living in a very special little bubble of denial.

It scares me to know that this woman is armed.

[DigitalBuddha]

Dude,when has this crazy bitch EVER listened to FACTS,or LOGIC?
And also,lets not forget that Feinstein herself has a concealed carry permit!
Guns are good for her,and her staff,but bad for everyone else.
Not much I can say about a hypocrite like this,except I think she IS insane,and living in a very special little bubble of denial.

It scares me to know that this woman is armed.

And worse; she's a US Senator...now that scares the piss out of me!

[RighteousDude]

And worse; she's a US Senator...now that scares the piss out of me!

Democracy can be scary at times. Maybe some day we'll have a new constitutional convention and try democracy for a change. 

[Stever]

I am all for this "democracy" you speak of!

[RighteousDude]

I am all for this "democracy" you speak of!

It does seem like a very nice concept, doesn't it?

I could very well be wrong, but it seems to me that on the scale of, say, the US, democracy couldn't work anyway. Capitalism will always overthrow democracy because the capitalists can afford to put the very smartest people on their payrolls, while the voting populace is relatively stupid and easily duped. Vide Fox News and those who watch it being the most ill-informed people on the continent.

I'm guessing we'll see a global killer asteroid strike long before we see human society making sense.